Paris during World War II seems to have made it back on my list again. Death in the City of Lights is no ordinary WWII read, though: it's the true account of a serial killer, Marcel Petiot, preying on a cross-section of Parisians (for example, Jews fleeing Nazis as well as gangsters and prostitutes) at the height of the Occupation. Not only that, but the serial killer is a seemingly well-respected physician with connections to both the Resistance and the Underworld.
David King's telling is meticulously researched and recounted. In all of my previous reading of Paris during the war years, I had never heard this story, which is quite remarkable, not least because even today authorities are unsure of how many individuals Petiot killed - at least 26, but possibly as many as 150. (The uncertainty is due to the ways in which people simply disappeared during the war, a terrifying history in and of itself which bears thinking about.) King begins this book with the gruesome discovery of the bodies, then weaves the tangled web that confronted the authorities (full disclosure: I skipped the paragraphs that appeared to have too high an "ick factor" for me). At times I was as confused as Inspector Massu and Company must have been, but with his prodigious research, King does a fine job of untangling the web in an Epilogue that provides reasonable and satisfactory answers to most questions.
Death in the City of Light is well-written and provides fascinating insight into the relationship between the various factions in Paris during the War. However, I did have two complaints. The first, which probably could not be entirely helped is that the cast of characters is tremendously long and I had a hard time remembering the relationships between them. (This is further compounded by the fact that many of them have additional code names or aliases and so even keeping straight, for example that Petiot is also Captain Valeri, Dr. Eugene, and Dr. Watterwald!) In other cases, a character may disappear for hundreds of pages before reappearing, in which case I was grateful to be reading this on my Nook, which enabled me to do a quick search and remind myself who the person in question was. Obviously the latter instances could have been more easily addressed by the author than the former. My second complaint was that, once this book moved into the trial phase, it became a bit lopsided: some of the best passages come from the trial, which was aptly described as a "circus" at the time, but some of the most tedious passages are also contained in those chapters.
I think this is a great read for anyone looking to gain deeper insight into World War II Paris or those who would like to read something that's a bit "off the beaten path," so to speak. A more casual reader, less interested in the workings of the Occupation or mid-twentieth century Paris, may find it less enjoyable.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Friday, June 22, 2012
The Uncommon Reader
It’s the Queen’s Jubilee! Okay, so I missed it by a few
weeks, but I actually read this little book—at 119 very small pages, the novella
designation is very apt – closer to the Jubilee than I’m finally posting my
review of it. (Also, I should add that it has been on my list for quite some
time, but all the coverage of the Queen did spur me to actually drive to the
library and check it out.)
So, what if Queen Elizabeth II started reading one day and
became so addicted that it was all she wanted to do? That is the central
question of Alan Bennett’s book, which begins with a rather improbable visit by
Her Majesty to a traveling bookmobile/library. Never a tremendous reader, she
is suddenly hooked and cannot get enough of the written word. She rides in
carriages with a book open on her lap, she dismisses the Prime Minister early
from their weekly sessions so that she can resume her stories, and she selects
staff based on their appreciation for all things literary. The “peripheral”
grandchildren are sent to purchase the titles their grandmother wishes to read
next.
It’s all a bit silly, really, although at heart, this is
less a book about the Queen’s imagined love of reading and more a book about
what it means to love to read. For example, Bennett imagines, “the sheer
endlessness of books outfaced her and she had no idea how to go on” and
compares literature to a vast country to the borders of which one can travel
but never reach. “I will never catch up,” the Queen laments on the same page.
And it is true. For how many times have you contemplated the books in the
library, or even the titles on an (ever-growing) reading list and thought, “so
many books, so little time?” Later Bennett writes of the Queen that she “had
not expected the degree to which [reading] drained her of enthusiasm for
anything else.” I have often been guilty as charged.
The Uncommon Reader is definitely a bit far-fetched (to say
nothing of the ending, which was very well done and absolutely made me
chuckle), but if you are looking for a fast, light, fun summer read, love
books, and can sympathize with wanting to do nothing but turn the page and find
out what happens next, you’ll not be disappointed. And if you're more interested in the real life and times of the queen, I'd suggest adding Sally Bedell Smith's Elizabeth the Queen to your reading list.
Wednesday, June 13, 2012
The Girl in the Blue Beret
The second book I read on vacation was, unfortunately, as disappointing as the first (How I Paid for College...). The story is this: it's 1980(ish) and a former World War II pilot is about to retire from his job as a commercial airline pilot. Forcibly - pilots used to be required to retired at 60. Anyway, to mark his retirement, he decides to visit the Belgian site where he crash landed during the war. Remembering the Belgian and French civilians who helped him and the surviving members of his crew evade the Germans and return to London by way of Spain at great risk to themselves, he moves to France and begins to search for these men and women.
The premise is great and, reading in Paris, which is also the setting for much of the book, the location had much to recommend it as well. Yet, after a strong start, it never really held together. For example, a few characters disappeared completely and others were introduced only to have their stories fizzle or to leave me wondering why they had been introduced. Had two characters truly entered the story only as a way to tell the story of one particular wartime atrocity or was I missing something? Clumsily, in fact, the focus of the story changed, zeroing in on the ruthless and barbaric acts the Germans committed and contemplating the impact these acts had on one particular character - whom we never met.
As quickly as the book changed course, it ends, and in a way that left me completely unsatisfied as a reader. Where had all of these characters gone? Not only was I left with that question (as well as the 'whys' I mentioned earlier, but in many ways I was unclear of even how it was ending. If I thought this were to set-up a sequel, I would be more forgiving, but really it felt like the author (Bobbie Ann Mason) simply grew tired of writing. All in all, I had high hopes when I began reading, and probably through the first half of the book even, but by the end I was confused, frustrated, and disappointed.
The premise is great and, reading in Paris, which is also the setting for much of the book, the location had much to recommend it as well. Yet, after a strong start, it never really held together. For example, a few characters disappeared completely and others were introduced only to have their stories fizzle or to leave me wondering why they had been introduced. Had two characters truly entered the story only as a way to tell the story of one particular wartime atrocity or was I missing something? Clumsily, in fact, the focus of the story changed, zeroing in on the ruthless and barbaric acts the Germans committed and contemplating the impact these acts had on one particular character - whom we never met.
As quickly as the book changed course, it ends, and in a way that left me completely unsatisfied as a reader. Where had all of these characters gone? Not only was I left with that question (as well as the 'whys' I mentioned earlier, but in many ways I was unclear of even how it was ending. If I thought this were to set-up a sequel, I would be more forgiving, but really it felt like the author (Bobbie Ann Mason) simply grew tired of writing. All in all, I had high hopes when I began reading, and probably through the first half of the book even, but by the end I was confused, frustrated, and disappointed.
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
How I Paid for College: A Novel of Sex, Theft, Friendship, and Musical Theater
I picked up How I Paid
for College at the immensely wonderful Powell’s Bookstore in Portland,
Oregon, earlier this spring. It was a staff pick and, particularly as I had
read and enjoyed several other staff picks (Destiny of the Republic chief among them), I skimmed a few pages and decided to
purchase a copy. The premise of the story is that Edward Zanni has lived a
nice, cushy life until his father remarries to a “stepmonster” and then refuses
to pay for him to attend Juilliard. At times, it was funny. Mostly, however,
the pranks, frauds, and hijinks felt entirely non-sensical and often gratuitous.
The characters largely blended together, which was weird because it was clear
that many of them were intended to be the ultimate stereotype of one or another
type: the junkie, the exotic foreigner, the eccentric theater student, etc. This
was especially strange because I felt like one of the subliminal messages of
the book was a sort of “there’s-more-to-any-person-than-meets-the-eye” lesson,
where the reader is supposed to look beyond the supposed stereotype to see the
whole person. At the end of the day, I just couldn’t buy it, though, and the
feeling I had upon finishing the book was one of relief.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)